circuscritic

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

circuscritic , (edited )

Depends on what the definition of "working" is.

If it's to damage China's EV producers, then yes, they'll work.

If it's to promote sales of domestically produced EVs, then probably a bit, although to what degree is unknown.

If it's to help domestic producers ramp up and grow the domestic EV market at, or around, the same rates that cheap imported EVs would... probably not.

Which circles back to, if the goal is to dampen and slow the adoption of EVs en masse, then yes, it will probably work. Although, to what degree is unknown and can be heavily influenced by other forms of legislation and regulation.

circuscritic , (edited )

That is their publicly stated goal, but that doesn't mean it's the policies true objective, or it's only one.

I'm not providing any moral, or value, judgement on any of this, nor am I claiming to know what went on inside the halls of power when crafting this policy that isn't public knowledge.

I'm simply stating that there are many "objectives" that this policy might be intended to achieve, other then what's been publicly promoted.

Which is pretty much true for any piece of legislation or new regulations that get processed through bureaucratic machinery with many competing outside influences and pressures.

FWIW I'm not a free trade economic liberal. I support protectionism, when it's justified. Especially in cases where it protects workers, or counters hostile policies e.g. dumping.

circuscritic ,

There are legitimate justifications for this type of protectionism, such as dumping and other predatory pricing schemes. Those are reasonable and legitimate concerns in this instance.

My point was that for a policy with so many vested and monied interests, it's not unreasonable to consider that the policy makers might have alternative, or additional, policy objectives as well, including ones that aren't publicly acknowledged.

Weird flex ( sopuli.xyz )

Alt text: A LinkedIn post with a picture of a couple looking at each other. The text on the image reads: 9 years ago I DMed my crus h telling her I’m going to take her out on a date, yesterday I asked her to marry me, she said no both times and blocked me. Anyways here’s a picture of a random couple I found on google.

circuscritic ,

This is clearly a joke. It has a premise, setup, and a punchline…

circuscritic ,

Solidarity and action requires communication. There’s NO way to coordinate that type of collective action and keep it secret.

Much better to say it loud and often to build support.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines