nymag.com

theodewere , to Politics in Trump Supporter Charged With Threatening to Kill Trump’s Trial Judge
@theodewere@kbin.social avatar

just another Trump coward who can't handle the truth.. you all got some long nights ahead..

clobubba ,

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • theodewere ,
    @theodewere@kbin.social avatar

    she's standing up for defending herself against Reality, and don't kid yourself into believing anything else.. because she's gonna try to hide from it, and force YOU to deal with it for her.. stop being understanding.. she isn't.. they're all HOSTILE..

    whiskeypickle , to Politics in Trump Supporter Charged With Threatening to Kill Trump’s Trial Judge
    @whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml avatar

    Sadly, I’m sure this won’t be the last time this happens.

    YaaAsantewaa , to Politics in Trump Supporter Charged With Threatening to Kill Trump’s Trial Judge

    This is why Trump was dangerous for Democracy, he enabled psychopathic transphobic, racist and bigoted weirdos like this and encouraged this kind of behavior

    I honestly don’t know what to say anymore, if these incidents don’t convince you that Trump and his supporters are human trash then nothing will

    whiskeypickle ,
    @whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml avatar

    He’s dangerous for everything and everyone, including his own supporters, who often end up either in jail, or even dead, because they were followers of his. Even his lawyers end up getting screwed just because they worked for him.

    YaaAsantewaa ,

    Yeah, I didn’t mean to imply it was simply just this which I guess I sort of did, he’s just dangerous in general, and this is example

    Semi-Hemi-Demigod , to Politics in Lindsey Graham: Don’t Indict Trump, or Impeach Him, or Vote Against Him
    @Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

    Somebody doesn't want pictures of his ladybugs leaked

    FARTYSHARTBLAST , to Politics in Lindsey Graham: Don’t Indict Trump, or Impeach Him, or Vote Against Him
    @FARTYSHARTBLAST@sh.itjust.works avatar

    …a man named Lindsey?

    I don’t know, sounds kinda woke.

    Jaysyn , to Politics in Lindsey Graham: Don’t Indict Trump, or Impeach Him, or Vote Against Him
    @Jaysyn@kbin.social avatar

    I hope both of them die in prison.

    sik0fewl ,

    At the rate things have been moving, I just hope Trump lives to see prison.

    ulkesh , to Politics in Lindsey Graham: Don’t Indict Trump, or Impeach Him, or Vote Against Him
    @ulkesh@beehaw.org avatar

    you’re changing the game in America

    Wrong, you spineless fucktard. Republicans already changed the game when you decided that a lying, misogynistic, treasonous, con-artist, tiny-penised, reality show moron is the best person to lead your party.

    This is not weaponizing the law…it is the proper application of the law because the piece of shit VIOLATED THE LAW. It’s time he rots in prison for it. Graham should just shut the fuck up.

    The real sad outcome of all of this…people still listen to Graham and still vote for him — as they do with Trump. One day the world will be rid of all of these idiots.

    keeb420 , to Politics in Lindsey Graham: Don’t Indict Trump, or Impeach Him, or Vote Against Him

    I thought they wanted law and order and people to stand up for.the rule of law?

    Oh wait. This just in they are hypocrites in everything.

    spaceghoti OP ,

    From Francis Wilhoit:

    Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

    There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

    vanderburg.org/etc/quotes/wilhoit-conservatism/

    Rapidcreek , to Politics in Lindsey Graham: Don’t Indict Trump, or Impeach Him, or Vote Against Him

    We already decided this at the ballot box. And during trump’s impeachments, you said they should be decided in the courts.

    Here we are.

    jballs ,
    @jballs@sh.itjust.works avatar

    “You can’t indict a sitting president, that’s what impeachment is for.”

    “You can’t impeach a sitting president, that’s what the election is for.”

    “You can’t impeach the president again now that he’s lost the election, that’s what the justice system is for.”

    “You can’t indict someone running for president, that’s what the next election is for.”

    Semi-Hemi-Demigod ,
    @Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

    "You can't nominate a Supreme Court Justice during an election"

    jballs ,
    @jballs@sh.itjust.works avatar

    Followed quickly by “of course you can nominate a Supreme Court Justice during an election.”

    Fixbeat , to Politics in Lindsey Graham: Don’t Indict Trump, or Impeach Him, or Vote Against Him

    So, one of his arguments is that conservatives would try to game the system to go after dems, if the dems do it first? Right, like they did to Clinton, Obama and Biden? Who are they trying to fool?

    JonEFive ,

    The same people they’ve been fooling into voting for them for years. This is just propaganda speech delegitimizing the judicial process when they’re held to account for their crimes.

    spaceghoti OP ,

    It’s the language of the abuser. “See what you’re making me do to you?”

    notannpc , to Politics in Jack Smith Wants to Put Trump on Trial Before the Election

    Any reasonable person would want this to be settled before the next election. Sadly the venn diagram of reasonable people and people who vote for Trump is just two completely separate circles.

    spaceghoti OP ,

    They’re fine with the world being unfair, as long as they think it’s unfair to their advantage.

    Jaysyn , to Politics in Jack Smith Wants to Put Trump on Trial Before the Election
    @Jaysyn@kbin.social avatar

    Trump should already be in prison & would be if Merrick fucking Garland didn't drag his feet for two years.

    p03locke ,
    @p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Merrick Garland is still the current US Attorney General, and was the one who appointed Jack Smith as the Special Counsel, so how is this relevant?

    spaceghoti OP ,

    Because if Garland hadn’t dragged his feet and refused to allow the DOJ to investigate this in a timely fashion, we could already be into Trump’s appeals by now. Garland has only reluctantly allowed this prosecution to go forward, and only because Democrats in Congress forced his hand by revealing to the public just how strong the evidence is of Trump’s criminal culpability.

    We shouldn’t have had to wait this long for this to come to trial.

    Overzeetop , to Politics in Jack Smith Wants to Put Trump on Trial Before the Election
    @Overzeetop@kbin.social avatar

    It would seem logical that Trump would want to demonstrate - once and for all in a court of law - that he is innocent of any wrongdoing as soon as possible so as to not have it hanging over him in the race. Mr. Smith is merely offering him that opportunity.

    AnonTwo , to Politics in Jack Smith Wants to Put Trump on Trial Before the Election

    I think everyone pretty much knows why it hasn't happened yet.

    Make sure to vote in this upcoming election.

    blazera , to Politics in Jack Smith Wants to Put Trump on Trial Before the Election
    @blazera@kbin.social avatar

    it's only been nearly 4 years since the crime, surely he should be taking it a bit slower, we still have a few years left in the statute of limitations.

    venusenvy47 ,

    It’s been less than three years since this crime.

    blazera ,
    @blazera@kbin.social avatar

    yeah Im dumb.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines