nymag.com

glacier , to Politics in Trump’s Economic Plan: Raise Taxes on the Middle Class, Cut Them on the Rich
@glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Taxes aren’t the only major economics issue. Trump opposed NAFTA which was big in regards to the working class vote. Biden and the Democrats failed to support the rail workers last year who threatened to strike over paid sick leave. Obviously Trump’s camp is wrong on this and will make a terrible administration but Democrats are not exactly as pro-labor as they could be either.

caffinatedone ,

I get the reflexive urge to both-sides things, but rail workers did end up getting their sick leave:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/most-unionized-us-rail-workers-now-have-new-sick-leave-2023-06-05/

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/may/01/railroad-workers-union-win-sick-leave

Biden wanted to avoid the disruption that a rail strike would bring, especially when we were trying to deal with inflation, but like many things, they quietly got it done.

glacier ,
@glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Thank you for sharing, I didn’t know

Alto ,
@Alto@kbin.social avatar

More cynically, I think they didn't want to loudly show that unions and striking work

Jaysyn ,
@Jaysyn@kbin.social avatar
Corkyskog ,

Sounds about right… pretty sure unions only got the concessions like a 5 day work week because they were fighting so hard for it, that there started to become grumbling about owning the means of production.

Bartsbigbugbag ,

No, they ended up with 28% of their stated request. 4 days. 4. Literally every single employee, full time or part time, in my entire state gets more than that.

I also don’t see anything about the safety issues that they were planning to strike against, which is not a small issue.

Truck_kun , (edited )

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • nickwitha_k ,

    Seems like something that they should be shouting from the rooftops…

    glacier ,
    @glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

    Thanks for sharing this, I didn’t know

    Truck_kun ,

    [Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • Bartsbigbugbag ,

    Or, because if they start shouting it from the rooftops, people will point out that the Biden administration agreement gives them 4 days out of the 14 they were fighting for, and addresses none of the safety issues that they were fighting for.

    LanyrdSkynrd , (edited ) to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    One of the billionaires who owns Clarence Thomas did have business before the court and he didn’t recuse himself.

    fortune.com/…/clarence-thomas-billionaire-friend-…

    One of his clerks received 7 payments for thousands of dollars via venmo labelled “Clarence Thomas Christmas party” from conservative lawyers who have argued cases before the court.

    The lawyers who made the Venmo transactions were: Patrick Strawbridge, a partner at Consovoy McCarthy who recently successfully argued that affirmative action violated the US constitution; Kate Todd, who served as White House deputy counsel under Donald Trump at the time of the payment and is now a managing party of Ellis George Cipollone’s law office; Elbert Lin, the former solicitor general of West Virginia who played a key role in a supreme court case that limited the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions; and Brian Schmalzbach, a partner at McGuire Woods who has argued multiple cases before the supreme court.

    theguardian.com/…/clarence-thomas-aide-venmo-paym…

    wagoner , to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    I don’t have business before the supreme court but I sure as hell have an interest in their rulings. We all do! That’s such a BS defense they and others make.

    argv_minus_one , to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    They don’t have to defend him. He’s unassailable as long as Congress remains infested with Republicans.

    PrincessLeiasCat , to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    Please turn down the gaslight…I didn’t think to bring sunglasses.

    MisterMoo , to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct
    @MisterMoo@kbin.social avatar

    "The liberals made my life miserable for 43 years, and I'm going to make their lives miserable for 43 years.” — Clarence Thomas

    chaogomu , to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    They bury the lede. These friends are not parties before him as a Justice of the Court.

    Yeah, I'm pretty sure that some of his friends have been beneficiaries of some of Thomas' rulings.

    AllonzeeLV , (edited ) to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    Our owners and their paid managers in the Courts, in the Congress, and both major parties have reached the point where rhetorical defense is no longer relevant.

    We’ve reached the “So what if I did? Want to cry about it?” stage of this collapse.

    You see it everywhere. Corporations used to do damage control after mass layoffs, now they literally insult the employees on the way out the door and brag about their cruelty on the money shows.

    The small sect of our society that are in the country club no longer fear consequences, and for good reason, as they’ve captured any governmental bodies that would earnestly seek or inflict them. And if that fails, they still have legions of deluded, self-hating peasants ready to protect their own oppressors out of the sunk cost fallacy.

    GreenMario ,

    Hollywood: we will starve them out.

    Maturin , to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    There is some delicious irony in 100+ Thomas clerks signing an opinion that ignores the actual issue, reaches a pre-determined conclusion based on their preexisting support for the guy, and gives no logical or objective reason why you should agree.

    atempuser23 ,

    It’s not ironic. These actions are exactly why they got the job of clerk in the first place. They are responsible for holding up the appearance of propriety so people have faith in the rule of law. The whole court should be holding him to some kind of account.

    s20 , to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    So Thomas’s law clerks don’t know what ethics are?

    Is anyone really surprised by that?

    Kraven_the_Hunter , (edited ) to Politics in Even Clarence Thomas’s Law Clerks Can’t Defend His Misconduct

    They must use a different module for annual ethics training than my company uses. I wonder if we can switch and start using their provider?

    argv_minus_one , to Politics in Palin’s Civil War Threat a Sign of Very Bad Things to Come

    MAGA cultists attempting terrorist attacks is the least of our worries. They have already demonstrated their abject incompetence in armed combat.

    More worrying is what will happen if Trump wins the election. He has a pretty good chance of doing so, because the election is rigged in his favor. He only barely lost in 2020, it’s a miracle that he did, and relying on repeated miracles is a very poor survival strategy…

    reverendsteveii , to Politics in Palin’s Civil War Threat a Sign of Very Bad Things to Come

    Let’s get it the fuck over with then. This thing where they just keep throwing a giant fit and threatening a civil war needs to end, and they’ve been extraordinarily clear that they won’t let it end peacefully unless we let them dismantle our democracy and that’s not an option.

    BillTheTailor , to Politics in Palin’s Civil War Threat a Sign of Very Bad Things to Come

    I don’t think any of the gravy seals have it in them to actually take on the government. Soon as they see their buddies torn in half by a 50cal it’s going to blow the fight right out of them. Sure, sure, it’s all “I’ll die for my country!” but you put a gun to their head and say, “America needs your life now”, not one in ten will have the courage of their conviction.

    I used to doom-scroll to see what bullshit embarrassment Trump was going to put our country through on any given day. Now I’m doom scroll hoping to read his obituary.

    CapgrasDelusion , (edited ) to Politics in Palin’s Civil War Threat a Sign of Very Bad Things to Come

    If he wins despite the massive “election interference” he faces, he is fully justified in unleashing the vengeance that is so prominent a part of his 2024 message. If he seems to lose … it’s clearly grounds for whatever extra-constitutional redress he and his supporters choose.

    This was all true before she opened her mouth. He's been laying the foundation for that for 3 years. He continues to, despite his indictments for doing so.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines