arstechnica ,
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Google kills “One” VPN service, says “people simply weren’t using it”

Did anyone want a VPN from the Internet's largest data collector?

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/04/google-is-killing-off-its-one-vpn-service/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

georgengelmann ,
@georgengelmann@mastodon.electroncash.de avatar

@arstechnica

"Did anyone want a VPN from the Internet's largest data collector?"

Good point. 🤔

humanhorseshoes ,
@humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world avatar

@arstechnica Didn;t even know it existed

Frontier ,
@Frontier@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica It's made by Google.That instantly kills half the reason to use a VPN.

PizzaDemon ,
@PizzaDemon@mastodon.online avatar

@arstechnica I sort of view it as Google already has all my stuff, no need for anyone else.

karelbrits ,
@karelbrits@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica I didn't even know it was offered in the pack.

Npars01 ,
@Npars01@mstdn.social avatar
RealGene ,
@RealGene@mastodon.online avatar

@arstechnica @briankrebs
In a semi-related vein, I was in DC last week, and found that public WiFi at the Smithsonian and several other locations actively block the Google Fi VPN (and I assume any/all other VPNs as well).

kaffeeringe ,
@kaffeeringe@social.tchncs.de avatar

@arstechnica Why didn't they simply use Android to manipulate users into using it? Isn't that the way, Big-Tech normally establishes new services?

Q ,
@Q@friendsofdesoto.social avatar

@arstechnica The majority of users are not concerned with privacy - look at the billions of downloads for any major social media network. However, VPN users in general probably have a higher threshold for an acceptable level of privacy and are already using something that is privacy focused.

I'll add that I see nothing wrong with the product in general, a casual user securing communications from public hot spots or keeping traffic data away from the ISP is fine. Awareness is the first step.

pch ,
@pch@s3th.me avatar

@arstechnica not me! Finally Google kills a product that should be scrapped.

tehstu ,
@tehstu@hachyderm.io avatar

@arstechnica My Google One subscription cost will be lowered because it now comes with fewer features.

(Haha)

cpurdy ,
@cpurdy@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica Yeah, the KGB also is having problems attracting users to its VPN.

MartinBe ,
@MartinBe@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica Who normal want to use something that is a fake and yet another google driven piece of junk? It is not a real vpn, but only an semi transparent proxy. Identical one to this later implemented "for free" in their Pixel phones. But for this "for free" people are in the reality paying with their own data and privacy. Funny, that they are killing the service not long after being accused of misinformation fraud vs customers, pulled to the light by some security researchers.🤣😂

768kb ,
@768kb@mastodon.social avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines