@ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world cover

ElectroVagrant

@[email protected]

Another traveler of the wireways.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

ElectroVagrant ,

The closest I could find that seems like it may be relevant given the context was this entry for いらいら, but I don’t think that’s correct either tbh.

ElectroVagrant ,

No, this is mistaken. If a digital storefront sells their media in a DRM-free format, you receive the files in an unrestricted way, similar to if you bought a physical book, movie, or album.

Unrestricted is not to say given permission to copy and distribute as you’d like, but that’s the same as for physical media.

ElectroVagrant ,

Fwiw I can see where you’re coming from, but I don’t really understand why/what for. Game Pass isn’t really comparable to Steam or a digital storefront anyway, which already makes the comparison kind of silly. That said, I recognize you were going off the other commenter’s framing in the argument there, so not faulting you for following along with it. I did just the same in my reply before giving it some more thought with this one.

Nevertheless, it is worse in terms of ownership, but that was never its selling point to begin with, so it’s silly to criticize it in that respect, much as it would be to criticize Netflix for not providing ownership of what it gives access to. Also regarding Steam DRM, xcjs covers that nicely in the other reply here.

ElectroVagrant OP ,

Is there a community for posting links to topic-focused instances? If not, I may start one.

Do you mean like a more focused version of the fediverse community, but for highlighting/sharing links to topic-focused instances? That may be kind of interesting as another form of the newcommunities/findacommunity type of communities, just for entire instances.

ElectroVagrant ,

So if Threads isn’t trying to overwhelm and destroy Mastodon, why have ActivityPub support at all? Two answers. First, “Look, see? We’re open!” is not only perceived as a great talking point these days, it’s perceived as a regulatory relief valve. Look, see? ActivityPub! We’re open!

Second, remember that the business model for Threads is keeping you on Threads. If 95% of your friends are on Threads but 5% are over on that weird Mastodon thing, now you don’t have to use Mastodon to follow them! Just follow them from Threads! Woo! Will Threads be a good Mastodon client? No, but it just has to hit “good enough.”

These are also great points to highlight imo. A throwaway defense against regulation and entrenchment by enabling access to the few friends that outright refuse to use their products both make more sense to me compared to some of the EEE arguments & data collection. I’d be more inclined to see Meta/Facebook doing the bare minimum with ActivityPub and using a strict allow list vs. open federation, but time will tell.

ElectroVagrant ,

I just caught wind of this as I was catching up on news. It remains frustrating to see the blatant hypocrisy of these folks.

I’m sure it needn’t really be said as it’s probably been said a million times already, but it flies directly in the face of their supposed stance of “small government” or otherwise deferring to more local government.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines