@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Shadywack

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

This is exactly why I call corporate DEI fucking worthless. It's pinkwashing with nothing substantive behind it. We see all the rainbows during pride month, while at the same time companies disregard all protected classes (and unprotected classes) quite equally in the layoffs and unethical worker treatment. Cis, trans, gay, straight, queer, furry, binary or non binary, old, and young are all equally getting fucked.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

I've seen this too, the ones who bitch the most will trash the union and the company, but seldom if ever actually show up at union meetings. It's inherited from a culture of apathy, and this "give nothing in return" is a big issue.

Usually the democrats at least show up to the meetings, conservatives bitch and do nothing.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

I wonder where all that wealth would go if they suddenly died from accidents, and any potential heirs or next of kin also died.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

not a single person’s (poor or not) bank account would get bigger as a result

Likely not, but I’d like to think the social reforms with an attack on the wealthy would bring some of our rights back and help with our standards of living issues our poor currently face thanks to the wealthy systematically disabling the things that brought prosperity and protected people. While you call it murderous envy, others might call it true social justice.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

It’s not their stuff that’s wanted overall, to me it seems like hope is what’s in question here. They stand in the way of hope, voting doesn’t work, so I wonder if violent removal would.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Oh so medical bankruptcy isn’t a thing? Decline of ownership isn’t a thing? The unwinding of worker protections isn’t a thing? Shove off, bootlicker.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

How do those boots taste? That kind of shit right there is exactly how we backslide. Life expectancy is also higher than it was 1000 years ago. The only reason we left the first gilded age was a whole lot of legislation that’s been dismantled in the last 40 years, that if we go uncorrected we’ll be more impoverished than we were in that time period you referenced. “LOL” - as if to say it’s great that two generations can’t own a home, pay for healthcare, or retire. Real funny shit, asshole.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Maybe if you weren’t dismissive of facts and cherry picked timeframes that support a narrow point of view, you wouldn’t be such an unpopular ass. (Oh shit I can link stuff too, oh man, fuck, that means you might have to look at information too). Also, you’re a piece of shit scumbag that’s now on the block list. Fuck off and have a shitty life.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

“How old are you, mate? Does this look like Jackanory to you?! I know you’ve lost a lot of money, but you won’t find a penny of it in them books. If you wanna know what’s happening in the world, take a look at the world. Go take a walk down the high street. See all the shops closed down. Look at the homeless people under the bridge. Go home, and ask your mum about her financial situation. Ask your friends, ask your friend’s mums. The time for books is over, mate. You’re here now. Look at the world with your fucking eyes.”

That’s pretty damn sobering, and accurate. We’re so use to being told what to think, and my whole takeaway from this, apart from “Eat The Rich”, is to look for yourself. What he wrote after that paragraph is something we all should be doing. Looking at housing prices, looking at where real people are squeezed, and to act based on that. We’re just cattle.

I look at the US primaries and caucuses and I see nothing but bullshit, “cute moments” as described in this article that won’t help us at all. I look at Bernie Sanders’ bill about the 32 hour workweek and I think about the weak willed moderate Democrats who won’t vote for it, and all the scumbag Republicans who are not even hiding that they’re part of this exact problem of enriching the rich while removing wealth from everyone beneath them.

Capitalism can work, when its heavily regulated with active oversight and robust enforcement. We haven’t had a free market in many decades, the joke is on all the BS Republicans are peddling.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

What I mean specifically is the Gilded Age, vs the period of middle class growth during and post WW2. Concepts such as the Public Trust became important during these periods due to the Gilded Age itself and the postwar priorities emphasizing we lift up the nation instead of just the rich. I mean that capitalism is just the tool, albeit with heavy regulations, that generated a great deal of prosperity from the late 50’s through to the 70’s.

That’s the time period a person could graduate from High School and then earn enough to purchase a home and viably support a whole family.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

“I’m furious” and then an “so anyway” moment. Looks like a bunch of stern words that won’t be followed by any action whatsoever. At least they somewhat conceal the corporate dicksucking with a dog and pony show of “harsh words”. In the US we just get silence from our motherfucking politicians.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Somebody put Hohn’s head on a pike already.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

I like a short commute, and companies like to have their offices in expensive places that are unaffordable.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Being stuck on a 40 hour work week, but just doing four tens, I can say the 32 hour concept needs to continue having traction. More and more people are waking up to the reality that work is just work. There’s life to live and we have the means nationally to allow for a meaningful life. When considering employment, only getting two days off is a dealbreaker.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

This right here, I get the bulk of my responsibility completed in about 20 hours, where the rest of the time my particular role is that I’m compensated for “being available”. As for completion of my duties and helping the mission of the company is concerned, 32 hours for the same pay would actually save the company money. The “optics” though is what companies fear, and they don’t want to lose their leverage and power over workers.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

I’d be happy if I could just retire on time, which I don’t think is going to happen. I look at many people and still feel lucky that I “only” have to work 40 hours. People are compelled to work 60+ just for their subsistence and even they won’t have enough to retire.

Shadywack OP ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

It’s up to 3 now XD “those darn regulations!” …without wondering where regulations came from.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

I’m here to tell you that seeing “good perspective on each end of this” can fuck right off. Yes I’m going into full on asshole combative mode, and I am here to tell you unequivocally that you may go and fuck yourself!

And to eloquently point out why, I’m going to carefully explain why the employer side can eat shit: We have a massive climate change issue, and having workers commute is exacerbating on so many levels. Even if we electrify the transportation entirely with carbon free sources, there’s still a tremendous environmental impact issue by way of the public transportation or the car production itself. One of the best ways to mitigate this is encouraging remote work WHENEVER POSSIBLE! I realize pilots, EMT’s, and firefighter’s won’t have this luxury but if all the office workers are working from home, this removes a huge amount of congestion from our roadways, decreases the non-carbon pollutants resulting in dramatic air quality increase, improves emergency service response times, reduces the fucking taxes we have to pay on transportation infrastructure maintenance, and a host of other psychological benefits.

We have a huge pay gap - CEO’s are making hundreds of times more compensation than their average worker, and the time involved in commuting EVEN FURTHER dilutes the “amount made per hour”. If I have an hour commute each way, I get to take my day’s pay and stretch it over two more hours. What could anyone possibly have an issue with that for? Oh I don’t know, childcare? A dentist appointment that requires additional burned time off? This is why people call scabs motherfucking shithead scumbags. BuT tHe EmPlOyEr iSn’T ReSpoNsiBle, bull fucking shit. The employer chooses to be in some shitty downtown location so the uber rich CEO can walk from his cocaine penthouse to the HQ. For the life of me, I see this happen time and time again where HQ’s bitch and moan about attracting talent but they position themselves in some fucked up location where they don’t compensate even a fraction of what they should so their employees could afford housing.

We have a mental well being crisis - people are treated like shit and trampled on enough as it is. Many companies take this indifferent approach and focus solely on the business itself, with little to no regard for the people that make it successful. People are spending hours every day commuting instead of looking after their own personal well being. Commute times cut into exercise, family time, self actualization, and pretty much everything people care about.

The best way to mitigate this is by being on the clock from your front door to the workplace. As it was well put elsewhere here in the comments, fuck you, pay me. I will get the world’s tiniest violin out for the employer side of the argument and then stomp on with heavy work boots. Then I’ll light it on fire and piss on the goddamn ashes. Fuck the employer’s argument.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

A petty thing to bring up, like a scab would.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

I’m extremely antagonistic, yes, especially toward scab motherfuckers that have helped get us into the housing crisis, healthcare crisis, and climate crisis. You’re also right that I spit at a 25% raise, 40% motherfucker and then I stop using such harsh words.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Scabs can fuck off, and you sound awfully scabby there like you’ve licked a lot of boots to get where you are….

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

You better block a lot more than Lemmy. The workforce is sick of executive boots stomping on our necks. There are good employers out there, I acknowledge that, but they’re the exception not the rule from the way corporate America functions. To me they seem as rare as drops of water in the Sahara. Until employers start giving some dignity back to the worker en masse, expect things to get a lot more hostile.

For now it’s just nasty language, soon it’s going to be molotovs and worse. Eat the rich.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

What shareholders want isn’t what the customers want, what shareholders want isn’t what personnel want, what shareholders want isn’t what the public wants either.

The shareholders want to fuck the customer, they want to fuck the employees, and they want to fuck the business itself. Fuck the shareholders. They didn’t make the business successful, they didn’t have the vision that created the value in the first place, they’re leeches that ruin the business for short sighted goals.

Fuck the shareholders, and fuck the executives.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

I realize that many people’s retirements are tied up in stocks as well. That doesn’t make us “shareholders”. Without voting rights or a say, we’re not really vested in the same manner executives are. When our 401k’s go off to a fund manager that makes the decisions for us, we’re not really “in the game” as it were. Ideally a company’s stock price should be tied to the health of the company, instead what we have are artificial prices inflated by mechanisms such as stock buybacks or the stock price is speculative.

Either way, it’s a shit show for us (you know, regular people) and only great for the 1%'ers. I think tying up retirements like we have been is a mistake, look at the many examples of people who lost their retirement assets due to MCI Worldcom, Enron, and Madoff.

It’s a joke.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

The problem is that the billionaires never starve. They just end up with slightly less fathomless oceans of cash while we can afford rent or a mortgage.

If this doesn’t work, it’s time for some guillotines, then nobody has to starve at all.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

What the UAW is doing here is fighting for all workers. This sets precedents that ripple across all industries. What formed the UAW back in 1937 took some balls, and so does this.

It’s not communism to fight for dignity and a living wage. We’re practically fighting for some more table scraps, but the rich are acting like we’re threatening social fabric.

Go and get it Shawn, this is exactly what we all need right now. Support the UAW.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

There was a lot of the same thing back in the Roman Empire. The reason many more emperors weren’t gutted like a fish was due to their Praetorian Guard. If we had a solid way to get past the tear gas and national guard en masse, there’d be much less rhetoric and a lot more action. Hopefully we co-opt them, much like what happened back then. The Praetorians killed quite a few shitty emperors, hopefully we get after the oligarchs in the same manner.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

I mean, I can see a utopian vision of Communism where dignity is forefront, but I’ve also seen where it’s dystopian. Correct me if I’m wrong but the basis is to each according to their need and from each based on their abilities. Dignity isn’t mentioned, but the happiness and contentment of all is the goal so I suppose it’s inferred but not specified.

Either way, it doesn’t have to be viewed with any kind of social opposition. If we keep following the slippery slope of late game capitalism, who’s to say companies don’t just purchase legislation that re-establishes full on slavery? We have a fucked up oligarch system, and moments like this where workers unite is a good thing in any system. Free market my ass, and this is a moment where arguing for semantics is a side-discussion, for now it’s us against the oligarchs.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Good, fuck em. What doesn’t get talked about is what a huge ripoff the stock buybacks are and how they incentivize the race to the bottom we have now. CEO’s don’t answer to customers but to shareholders now, and their income is directly tied to share price as opposed to the company’s KPI’s.

A company can be healthy, profitable, and showing robust financials…but the investors can always say it’s not profitable ENOUGH, and demand further measures be taken to increase profits even more. Therefore the company is now directly pitted against both customers and employees. They are incentivized to deliver the least possible to the customer, while charging the most they possibly can, with the absolute least amount of employees delivering it while also paying employees the least they possibly can get away with, regardless of anything except the sole goal of basically fucking everyone that isn’t an investor.

Fuck the customers, fuck the workers, fuck the thing that created the success of the company in the first place.

What the UAW is doing is forcing the companies to change the nature of the operations and compensation packages. Either give the employees the same access to the cash drip feed from the stock performance or stop executives from being tied to stock price and go back to only partaking of the business revenue.

Either way, fuck the execs. I’d rather there be no company than those motherfuckers running it the way they have been. Now’s the time for it all to burn down or change for the improvement to the employees.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Agreed, whether it’s pay by mile, from when the door’s shut, when boarding, or set off by the time a certain phone call dispatches you, that’s just semantics. If you’re making a good wage or salary, what of it? The real issue is 24k-27k a year. That’s 13 bucks an hour on the top end. 13 bucks an hour when you have 2k a month rent for the cheap roach infested slums in most cities.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

Of all the unsung heroes of our modern infrastructure, Wabtec is the backbone of the rail industry’s most important safety equipment…the air brakes.

These workers need support, and the work Wabtec does is all because of what their workforce does. Without the Wabtec workers, we don’t have North American commerce.

Shadywack ,
@Shadywack@lemmy.world avatar

This article is aloof and out of touch. The challenges facing Gen Z are obvious.

Pollak recommended that companies employ a method called “reverse mentoring,” in which junior and senior employees meet regularly to discuss their perspectives on the workplace.

That mix could help increase workplace satisfaction and counter negative feelings younger workers have about their jobs. For instance, older employees are more likely to find their jobs enjoyable and fulfilling

No shit, older people have their housing, and also canard advice like “just show up”. When Gen Z shows up with 60k in debt, outrageously obscenely unaffordable housing prospects, absurd healthcare costs, and inflation all stacked ontop, the issue is not with the generation but the disparity. “Reverse mentoring” will only infuriate them.

This is coming from a Xennial, who is still waiting for those “good times” to show up that the fucking idiot boomers got handed early on.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines