eveninghere

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

kde , to KDE
@kde@floss.social avatar

We are looking for a new set of Community KDE Goals to work on.

What should KDE focus on over the next two years? Are you ready to share your vision, time and stamina to push KDE to the next level?

Let's evolve KDE together! Find out more here: https://blog.lydiapintscher.de/2024/06/05/what-should-kde-focus-on-for-the-next-2-years-you-can-propose-a-goal/

@kde

eveninghere ,

Yeah this whole community Goal is nonsense. We just want our DE to work as intended. And after 20 years it's still not the case.

eveninghere , (edited )

Is there already an x11vnc alternative for wayland? That's the only thing I need.

We don't want no fancy updates that will send us back to instabilities.

eveninghere ,

Maybe if you have to ask the community for a goal, you have nothing worth doing left.

eveninghere ,

No, because security. Look up how oauth works and why.

eveninghere ,

There are scammers who want your masturbation recorded. The Chinese Communist Party has a face database for surveillance.

eveninghere ,

Nah, no reason to downplay webcams.

The average user’d probably get ransomware attack. And if not, cam girl scams. I’d have a look on r/scam rather than argue theoretical worst case.

eveninghere ,

I have no idea why this is causing some weird controversy. Strange arguments out there.

eveninghere ,

If you’re a landlord wondering which tenants you have to accept, for example, you might pose a question like, “are buildings required to accept section 8 vouchers?” or “do I have to accept tenants on rental assistance?” In testing by The Markup, the bot said no, landlords do not need to accept these tenants. Except, in New York City, it’s illegal for landlords to discriminate by source of income, with a minor exception for small buildings where the landlord or their family lives.

The title is sensationalized. But I have no idea what NYC was thinking.

eveninghere ,

The title should have been something like “We all knew that AIs today can’t be used for legal advice, and we did a routine demonstration to show why”.

It’s not like the chatbot looked for ways the user breaks laws, which would be a news.

Someone who uses ChatGPT daily knows. This generation of chatbot won’t be able to work within all the details of NYC exceptions to go against laws elsewhere, which dominate the training data.

eveninghere ,

Tbf AOC is powered with an unstoppable engine, and so was his naive idea of legal chatbot business assistance.

eveninghere ,

I’ve started reading your references, and

“We cannot handcuff the police,” Mr. Adams said at a news conference at City Hall, where he was surrounded by community supporters and police officials. “We want to handcuff bad people for violence.”

OMG…

eveninghere , (edited )

IBM chief executive Ginni Rometty says “there is not one more important [topic] for all of us” than the potential of technology to create inequality by concentrating huge wealth in the hands of a few.

This is quoted to forecast the world without the UBI. But maybe this explains, in a strange manner, why Musk supports the UBI.

I mean that, the idea among the rich on the UBI is perhaps to rip people off job opportunities and concentrate money to them. The UBI would be a handy excuse for getting people off work. If that happens, we replace $30k, say, annual salary with $10k UBI.

I know I’m a paranoid, but we should be careful if the rich welcome something.

eveninghere , (edited )

Another thing to notice here is that Musk’s world view is consistently “rich gets richer” and, naturally, his premise on the UBI is the same: the rich will take away the jobs thanks to AIs. The ordinary will be on the UBI instead. We’re gonna fuck you, and you don’t fly away.

If he really cared about the ordinary, he’d not treat joblessness as inevitability in his argument. Because it’s him who has the power to make the ordinary richer, and he doesn’t engage on that at all. No way. No way he actually cares about the ordinary in his UBI argument.

📚 Online forum to ask Chicago Manual of Style related questions?

Does anyone know of a good (and hopefully also free) online forum where someone can ask questions related to the Chicago Manual of Style? Chicago Manual of Style’s page has an online question form, but it seems like it’s one of those “we’ll answer your question if we get to it” type of things. I need to ask questions...

eveninghere ,

Not sure if you’ll like it, but there’s writing.stackexchange.com

eveninghere ,

I don’t like that either. I just say, once you get used to it, it might become useful.

eveninghere ,

The court held that states may bar candidates from state office. “But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the court wrote.

While all nine justices agreed that Trump should be on the ballot, there was sharp disagreement from the three liberal members of the court and a milder disagreement from conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett that their colleagues went too far in determining what Congress must do to disqualify someone from federal office.

eveninghere , (edited )

Guessing it’s Russian propaganda or sympathy towards Gazans, the latter I find these days in The Intercept.

This article weirdly ignores the attached budget for Ukraine, which is the actual point of Biden’s proposal.

eveninghere ,

This might be a stupid suggestion, but Wifi 7 is to arrive on this Dec. It’s going to allow tens of Gbit/sec. Depending on your conditions, you might just buy a Wifi router.

eveninghere ,

Nah, if you steal a wallet because it was publicly available, that’s still a theft.

eveninghere ,

The metaphor doesn’t stand. In the case of FOX, you obtained information you were not supposed to. You can’t somehow put it back from your brain.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines