Trump’s Economic Plan: Raise Taxes on the Middle Class, Cut Them on the Rich ( nymag.com )

The discourse of the Trump era has been dominated by a conceit that the two major parties have swapped economic identities. The Democrats have supposedly abandoned their historical role as spokespeople for the working class to represent the neoliberal global elite, while the Republicans have been transmuted into scruffy populists. On the left, a mood of self-flagellating agony has prevailed, even as the party has won several elections in a row. On the right, the Republicans’ populist credibility has intensified their long-standing paranoia, “proving” that everything from the culture wars to Donald Trump’s endless crime spree is in fact a plot by the powerful to control them.

Yet, funnily enough, the two parties remain stubbornly attached to their traditional distributive goals. The Democrats still want to tax the rich and spend on the non-rich. Republicans still want very badly to do the opposite.

The Washington Post reports that Donald Trump’s campaign brain trust is working on a new economic plan to anchor his campaign. The leading idea is to pass another huge tax cut for the wealthy (a cut in corporate tax rates), paired with a tax increase on the middle class (a 10 percent tariff).

Trump’s brain trust believes current economic conditions indicate the U.S. economy is being harmed by excessively progressive taxes. To be sure, they have consistently believed this for more than 30 years through every conceivable combination of economic circumstances: high inflation, low inflation, recession, boom, war and peace,

Supply-side economics is a religion masquerading as an economic theory, and Trump’s brain trust, as it were, is a collection of the high priests of the supply-side cult: Arthur Laffer (who first began promoting supply-side economics nearly 50 years ago), Stephen Moore, Lawrence Kudlow, and Newt Gingrich.

sadreality ,

The Democrats still want to tax the rich and spend on the non-rich

Right....

Krackalot ,

Maybe 10 of them or so, certainly not the majority or even, not likely, a notable percentage.

carl_dungeon ,

Man, I haven’t wished necrotizing ass cancer on many people…

MonsiuerPatEBrown ,

Again.

theodewere ,
@theodewere@kbin.social avatar

we just might survive if we can get a few more billionaires in here.. they are what make this whole thing go..

Jaysyn ,
@Jaysyn@kbin.social avatar

Jokes on him, the has already destroyed the middle class.

Semi-Hemi-Demigod ,
@Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

Breaking news: Republican candidate has Republican ideas about tax cuts. Film at 11

Rhaedas ,
@Rhaedas@kbin.social avatar

Joke's on them, there is no middle class anymore, not as stereotyped.

sadreality ,

The stereo type is actually now "upper" middle aka people who can still actually afford that old school "middle class" shit

Gingerlegs ,

More of the same then?

WhatAmLemmy ,

This has been conservative and neoliberal SOP the world over for a good 5 decades.

You should only be surprised if that changes.

glacier ,
@glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Taxes aren’t the only major economics issue. Trump opposed NAFTA which was big in regards to the working class vote. Biden and the Democrats failed to support the rail workers last year who threatened to strike over paid sick leave. Obviously Trump’s camp is wrong on this and will make a terrible administration but Democrats are not exactly as pro-labor as they could be either.

caffinatedone ,

I get the reflexive urge to both-sides things, but rail workers did end up getting their sick leave:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/most-unionized-us-rail-workers-now-have-new-sick-leave-2023-06-05/

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/may/01/railroad-workers-union-win-sick-leave

Biden wanted to avoid the disruption that a rail strike would bring, especially when we were trying to deal with inflation, but like many things, they quietly got it done.

glacier ,
@glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Thank you for sharing, I didn’t know

Alto ,
@Alto@kbin.social avatar

More cynically, I think they didn't want to loudly show that unions and striking work

Jaysyn ,
@Jaysyn@kbin.social avatar
Corkyskog ,

Sounds about right… pretty sure unions only got the concessions like a 5 day work week because they were fighting so hard for it, that there started to become grumbling about owning the means of production.

Bartsbigbugbag ,

No, they ended up with 28% of their stated request. 4 days. 4. Literally every single employee, full time or part time, in my entire state gets more than that.

I also don’t see anything about the safety issues that they were planning to strike against, which is not a small issue.

Truck_kun , (edited )

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • nickwitha_k ,

    Seems like something that they should be shouting from the rooftops…

    glacier ,
    @glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

    Thanks for sharing this, I didn’t know

    Truck_kun ,

    [Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • Bartsbigbugbag ,

    Or, because if they start shouting it from the rooftops, people will point out that the Biden administration agreement gives them 4 days out of the 14 they were fighting for, and addresses none of the safety issues that they were fighting for.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines