rbreich ,
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

I can't believe I even have to say this, but it is not normal that the Supreme Court is taking its sweet time to decide if the president can incite an insurrection to overturn an election and maintain power. This should have been decided already. The answer is no!

corporatecrimes ,
@corporatecrimes@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

They are illegitimate Trump Toadies.

gooba42 ,
@gooba42@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich Their decision is "Immunity only applies to Trump". That was the plan right from the beginning when Trump's people allowed him to pack the court with his pet judges.

They ruled a couple of cases somewhat okay to provide cover for when he'd call on them to protect him.

They will defer this decision as long as possible to make sure Trump can be the only beneficiary of their treason.

amiserabilist ,
@amiserabilist@med-mastodon.com avatar

@rbreich

Wilhoit's law

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

the system is working as intended.

Clarity ,
@Clarity@c.im avatar

@rbreich Minority Rule is Minority Report Prophesied by PK Dick Needs no Tom Cruise sequel, or does it?

jhy001 ,
@jhy001@toot.community avatar

@rbreich! The most blatantly corrupt in history! !

JohnLoader6 ,
@JohnLoader6@masto.ai avatar

@rbreich If Trump wins Biden could legally have him executed

lou ,
@lou@entropyservice.com avatar

@rbreich The people who purchased the Supreme Court want their money's worth.

JimmyWalnuts ,
@JimmyWalnuts@noauthority.social avatar

@rbreich And don't forget that crazy far-right RFK, Jr! Nothing could protect Our Democracy™️ more than ensuring the Democratic candidate has no opponent. Amirite?

JosephSmith3130 ,

@rbreich they are still accepting bids! No reserve!

xs4me2 ,
@xs4me2@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

Bought and paid for…

eriner ,
@eriner@noauthority.social avatar

@rbreich Yes, it isn't normal for the Star Chamber to delay making up some bullshit and binding the whole country to their whim! What a miscarriage of justice! For shame!

strawhousepig ,
@strawhousepig@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich I would guess they are wading into the weeds of Qualified Immunity. Which is chilling because if they believe the correct answer ("No" btw) will put a crack in the foundation of QI that all police misdeeds stand on and which the courts firmly shore up at every chance, they will come back with a "yes".

PJ_Evans ,
@PJ_Evans@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich
The answer should have been an immediate and obvious "hell no, that's illegal and he should be impeached, convicted, tossed, and then tried."

MlleaPankhurst ,
@MlleaPankhurst@mstdn.social avatar

@rbreich

Again, we wouldn't be in this hell if Hillary won.

You were part of the cabal that hung her out and blamed her for everything she did as Secretary of State under President Obama but never attacked Obama- only her.

Npars01 ,
@Npars01@mstdn.social avatar
Avvielanche ,
@Avvielanche@mstdn.social avatar

@rbreich they need time to let the donations flow in and see which pile is bigger

ministerofimpediments ,
@ministerofimpediments@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich …oh, they have an answer…they are just trying to run out the clock for someone. Because if the answer is ‘yes’ then the first thing I would do as a sitting prez would be putting Trump and 4 justices on a plane aimed at the nearest volcano.

pelha ,
@pelha@mstdn.social avatar

@rbreich so since those justices were promoted by the federalist society, then the whole membership wants it that eay?!?

lightninhopkins ,
@lightninhopkins@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich I think the answer might be "yes" because they are a chance to take control.

Truth4ever ,

@rbreich Trump is not the peaceful, riding into the sunset, law abiding President who after losing an election, looked forward to writing his memoirs. Instead, he attempted to overthrow the government, by influencing a mob, and strong arming electors, Governors, and his Vice-President . He demanded that everyone around him comply with his crime. His actions can never fall under Presidential immunity. It would be criminal for any justice to allow Trump immunity or delay a ruling.

drakenblackknight ,
@drakenblackknight@mastodon.online avatar

@rbreich
A coconspirator's husband is a "justice."

lightninhopkins ,
@lightninhopkins@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich yeah, the SC is garbage, so that's what is happening.

suzieqpmp ,

@rbreich I did hear a positive explanation that they want to make it clear which things they will allow. That may help if Trump wins in Nov. I think I got that from a podcast with George Conway. Yet he will continue to break the law so why bother?

mtnrbq65 ,
@mtnrbq65@vivaldi.net avatar

@rbreich
Did I miss them asking the obvious question "would it be legal for the president to remove all the members of the supreme court?"

chicating ,
@chicating@mastodon.world avatar

@rbreich Possibly hell no!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines