@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world cover
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

c0mbatbag3l

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

c0mbatbag3l , to Frasier in What's your Frasier hot take?
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Makes perfect sense, he’s the straight man who’s constantly surrounded on all sides by chaos and people he doesn’t really jive with. He’s caught between two worlds and struggles to find others that are on the same wavelength.

He’s not as snooty as the high society he wants for himself, but he’s also not as down to earth as most. His lifestyle and the people he’s got in his life push his buttons which causes the reactions that make the character so beloved.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Are We All Too Cynical for Star Trek?
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

It’s easy, go and watch the way Picard deals with Barcley and then go watch discovery and see how their COs deal with problem crew members.

Modern Star Trek is written by adult children and you can fucking tell.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Are We All Too Cynical for Star Trek?
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

It wasn’t really always like this, in modern Trek they don’t have any ideals to aspire to, they just do what they have to. In DS9 you had Captain Sisko breaking his back trying to convince himself that letting Garak kill a Romulan diplomat to get them on the alpha quadrant’s side was worth it.

c0mbatbag3l , to Sysadmin in ICANN proposes creating .INTERNAL domain
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

You mean the OSI and TCP/IP models? Or just specifically TCP/UDP ports?

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Janeway’s “Tuvix” Decision Divides ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ Cast: “It Kind Of Hurt Her Character”
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

That’s my only real issue with her is her comment to the Nova class captain about it.

However, I give her the benefit of the doubt here because she’s clearly trying to encourage him that they don’t need to abandon their morality. If she tells him that she’s done it half a dozen times or so then he might be more likely to assume that’s the standard.

Now we all know in hindsight that he’d already committed an atrocity and wanted assurance from Janeway that he wasn’t alone in his decisions to prioritize crew over other sapient beings, but she was simply seeing the younger version of herself in him and attempting to assure him that he doesn’t have to give up hope and sink to those depths.

Voyager has more of a problem with character writing consistency than it does an issue with Janeway specifically, IMO.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Janeway’s “Tuvix” Decision Divides ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ Cast: “It Kind Of Hurt Her Character”
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Bajoran space was far away but not impossibly so from Federation resources, I’m not trying to say he’s a bad Captain, merely that the comparison to Janeway is a complete farce. If we are being fair they both fail to uphold the federation’s ideals.

If we are being reasonable, they both did what they had to do in order to save lives and get the job done.

My issue is the constant Trekky tendency to pretend Janeway is a shit bag and Sisko is somehow better, it’s just bias.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Janeway’s “Tuvix” Decision Divides ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ Cast: “It Kind Of Hurt Her Character”
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Exactly, had they not reversed the malfunction Janeway could be considered to have killed two of her crew. That somehow never gets brought up in the philosophy discussions surrounding the episode. Refusal to act when a solution exists makes her complicit in dual homicide.

Plus! After that one episode in TNG where they de-age replacement Crusher, we have no reason to believe transporters can’t solve literally all of these issues including death. For those not in the know, since the transporter has the last time someone energized stored in their memory banks it can simply reconstruct them as they were. A literal backup snapshot of the person.

Once that episode airs, all bets are completely off. I mean seriously, you could fix someone getting their head blown off by just transporting them but altering the image to correct for their last time leaving the ship. Death? Fixed. Wounds? Fixed. You can literally pull their backups and reconstruct at any time you want.

It’s foolish to think this is even a conundrum given that slip up, just duplicate and separate, keep all three. If transporters are really making matter out of energy it shouldn’t matter if there’s three people’s worth of matter, just use more energy.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Janeway’s “Tuvix” Decision Divides ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ Cast: “It Kind Of Hurt Her Character”
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, he was largely operating in safe space and still made some unethical decisions.

Janeway was willing to make the hard calls that would best serve her ship and it’s future, having your cook and your third in command get fused isn’t exactly going to result in a functioning chain of command.

Plus since the operation could be reversed, you could argue that Tuvok and Neelix aren’t actually dead, merely suspended animation like storing people in a transporter buffer. You’re still killing Tuvix, but sacrificing one to save two is “the needs of the many” in it’s most simplistic form even without the added weight of hundreds of lives depending on Tuvok’s leadership and tactical skills.

I never once considered Janeway to be out of line given her circumstances. The crew always comes first even at the cost of her own humanity and ethics. She’s a good captain, willing to make the call that ends lives and live with it so that others may not have to endure those decisions and consequences. She didn’t ask anyone else to do that for her.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Janeway’s “Tuvix” Decision Divides ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ Cast: “It Kind Of Hurt Her Character”
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Even Picard broke the PD multiple times. If we are basing ethics on that then he’s no better.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Let's remember some Star Trek games
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Star Trek: Legacy. I found a copy on eBay awhile back and got it running. Really fun go team up with AI against the Borg while defending DS9.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in there were two things in my advent calendar today
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Jadzia sure can fly 'em.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in Lower Decks: Can anyone tell me what I'm missing?
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Not liking the art style makes sense, it’s the same “kidney bean for a head” style that’s been taught at all animation schools for the last half decade now and it’s so overused that it just looks bad.

It’s the Rick and Morty style, essentially. Everyone’s copied it now.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in The surprisingly robust careers of Star Trek stars who became video game voice actors
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Funny, cause Michael Dorn and Mirina Sirtis were in Mass Effect. I guess Bioware knows their crowd.

c0mbatbag3l , to xkcd in xkcd #2862: Typical Seating Chart
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

You see the seats in the wings, right? The joke is that they’re inside the wing tanks where the fuel is stored.

c0mbatbag3l , to Star Trek in How did money work on deep space 9?
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

It was because they’d given him the supplies he needed to restart the bar after the FCA revoked his business license. So they were threatening to take back the equipment and start charging him rent again if he continued to do arms deals on the station.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines