HappycamperNZ

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

I held a baby squirrel today! ( lemmy.world )

Story time! We recently bought a rural property with a burnt down house on it and are going up every few weekends to clean it up. I'm up there this morning picking up random sheet metal and yeeting it into the trash pile. Suddenly I hear frantic squeaks....I look, and I accidentally yeeted the cover of a squirrel nest (I think...

HappycamperNZ ,

The real issue is the belief that essential services should make profit. Socialized, regulated Healthcare FTW.

HappycamperNZ ,

Dad of 3 here, probably similar age to you.

I am well aware of how hard we had it growing up, and how much effort it took us to get anything put aside. I remember two hours travel for an extra hour of work at my second job, 3am finishes and 6am starts, and still work weekends, public holidays and up to 26 hours in a row.

I am also unfortunately well aware this is becoming the norm, and at least we had a few years where this got you a bit ahead. Its now not enough for many and I don’t know how then next generation will manage.

HappycamperNZ ,

Uh… its not illegal for an investment to not make money?

HappycamperNZ ,

I believe a person/family should be allowed up to 3

  • live in
  • rent
  • bach.

Anything above that gets taxed in every way we can so you can and do make a profit, but its considered similar to other financial investments including risk.

Not sure how the loopholes would work if they own part with an ex, or kids, or single to relationship, but the general idea.

HappycamperNZ ,

Thats an interesting… owl???

Oh wait, puppy. There we go.

HappycamperNZ ,

I would argue yours is strawman - you are arguing against a city with quality public transportation which is not always the case and wasn’t the original arguement.

I think the biggest point the other poster is arguing is that personal choice comes into play. It’s not the employers job to tell you how to get to work, nor is it their responsibility if you want to take a job a distance from your house - its their job to find the best candidate who is willing to do the job offered.

You also argue against the argument that people won’t move house every time they change job. It sounds extreme, but it is always an option for the employee and a part of free choice.

HappycamperNZ ,

No, i am expecting you to be at your place of agreed work that you were well aware of, at a time we agreed as stipulated in your agreement that you were open to reject if it was not suitable for you.

Its not the employers job to tell you where to live, how to get to work, or what to spend you time doing outside of work hours. Don’t like the commute - pick a different job or move, you’re an adult who can make these decisions.

Better yet, start a business where you pay your employees this way.

HappycamperNZ ,

I mean, I have talked with a number of people who know that there are people they work with that are little more than “warm bodies” and get by doing as little as possible while dumping everything they can on someone else. They stay employed because “at least they do something” and there is no one else to do it. Before I get a “low pay” response, these are working professionals and paid accordingly.

It is also a well know economics trend (Phillips curve) that states as unemployed falls, inflation rises. Most countries are underemployed, and it is driving inflation.

Unless he is saying all workers are arrogant and entitled, in which case fuck him.

HappycamperNZ ,

I don’t want to go into too much detail, but 1.5 times the countries median wage - not minimum, not living, 1.5 times the countries average income - should be enough to get people to be able to answer a phone and respond to basic emails in a timely matter (like, 24 hours) when people’s lives and financial security are on the line.

This isn’t a top-talent argument - its acting with a basic sense of actually doing work while you are being paid.

HappycamperNZ ,

Low unemployment is a good thing- to a certain percentage (3% i think?). Not 0%.

People are arguing saying we expect some people living it tents - no, we expect to have people unemployed for a short time while they swap jobs, or seasonal workers out of season, or new grads looking for their first role.

HappycamperNZ ,

Based on the other person im “talking” with maybe management should be paid more to attract the right managers, and maybe management isn’t paid enough to do more than the bare basics.

I mean, what’s the difference? Both are people paid to do a job, yet change the job title and all of a sudden someone not doing a job shouldn’t be paid so much.

Are there shit managers - absolutely. But don’t act like employees not doing that they are paid to is acceptable either.

HappycamperNZ ,

While you have a valid arguement in this example 1.5 times median is about 60% above living wage.

HappycamperNZ ,

Happy to. I’ll happy tell a new grad they don’t have to work full time in a minimum wage job while they work through the process of acquiring their first post-grad role, or the student to enjoy their gap year traveling the country. Happily tell the seasonal worker who did 15 hour days over summer they made enough to have 6 months off. The stay at home parent that they are doing a good thing even though they aren’t getting paid for it, or the person transferring between jobs that they don’t have to start the day after resigning from their other role. Do you want to tell them all to get back into paid employment right now to keep unemployment at 0%?

HappycamperNZ ,

Uh… people and the economy??? To copy paste my other comment

I’ll happy tell a new grad they don’t have to work full time in a minimum wage job while they work through the process of acquiring their first post-grad role, or the student to enjoy their gap year traveling the country. Happily tell the seasonal worker who did 15 hour days over summer they made enough to have 6 months off. The stay at home parent that they are doing a good thing even though they aren’t getting paid for it, or the person transferring between jobs that they don’t have to start the day after resigning from their other role.

HappycamperNZ ,

Correct - but the unemployment rate doesn’t take that into account.

I lie, I gave a few bad examples. Those of working age but not looking (like the SAHP) are out of workforce and not included in unemployment rate. But seasonal, grads looking for the right job and those transferring between jobs are still unemployed and form that 3% i mentioned. The other type (structural unemployment) that relates to not having the skills that employers search for we should have as close to 0% as possible and that part is a concern.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines