kbin.pithyphrase.net

magnetosphere , to Work Reform in Got laid off today.
@magnetosphere@kbin.social avatar

I might consider relocating someplace nice, but an overhyped, overpriced city in one of the reddest red states? Kindly fuck off.

tukarrs , to Star Trek in Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x03 "In the Cradle of Vexilon”

In case you are wondering, the Koala says “It’s not your time, Bradward Boimler” in reverse.

lwaxana_katana ,

Oh cool, ty! I was wondering.

deepthaw , to Star Trek in Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Strange New Worlds | 2x07 "Those Old Scientists"

HE DOES THE WALK

RunningInRVA ,

My wife went nuts when he did it and she’s not even into this like I am.

givesomefucks , (edited ) to Star Trek in Why fed ship do not have dedicate landing team, but send bridge crew on dangerous mission ?

I always like the theory that the entire Starfleet is just a relief valve for people who can't be satisfied in a post scarcity utopia

They could stay on Earth and cause problems, or they can boldly go far the fuck away from an ideal society.

A high turnover of senior leadership due to stupid risks means that there's room for promotion and ambitious people stay in the fleet.

Otherwise they'd return to Earth and fuck up society.

Historically, every society needs some kind of relief valve like this or domestic issues develop. Once it's an entire world government, they need that relief valve to vent off planet. And that's what Starfleet is.

trolololol ,

Haha that could be an episode of lower decks, showing the back story of long hair, trouble maker Picard.

HobbitFoot ,

I feel like that also drove a lot of colonization for humanity. It doesn't make sense that so many people would want to leave Earth if it became paradise unless it wasn't as fulfilling and you could be in charge of more if you went off world.

ValenThyme ,

wow hard disagree, it's right there in the opening statement of the show:

to seek out new life, and new civilizations. To boldly go where noone had gone before

that's just, exciting!

yo_scottie_oh , (edited ) to Personal Finance in When people say they lost their 401k

Target funds are passively managed, which means nobody is sitting there trying to buy the bottoms and sell the tops, which is what we call actively managed funds. Not having anyone to constantly babysit them is what makes passively managed funds less expensive than actively managed in terms of expense ratios.

Target funds tend to consist of other passively managed index funds that provide broad market coverage and whose objectives are none other than to mirror the performance of a wide range of securities in a particular asset class.

If your friend’s 401k suffered a 50% loss in 2008 and did not recover on the way back up, that means either your friend panic-sold, your friend was in a (very poorly) actively managed fund, or (most likely) your friend is full of shit.

Regardless, I would recommend not taking financial advice from your friend.

To answer your question, as long as you hold passively managed index funds, you do not have to worry about someone “selling your stocks if the economy tanks.”

sugar_in_your_tea ,

It’s possible OP’s friend paid a crappy advisor to manage it and they messed it up.

satanmat ,

In a 401k one generally does not have a choice in management.

You may have a choice in only a few funds…. So yeah if your holdings were sold then yeah that sucks and hurts. Hence I agree with the top comment IF YOU CAN index funds…

sugar_in_your_tea ,

Usually a 401k will have two options: managed and self-directed. With managed, usually you pay some amount and the custodian selects investments. With self-directed, you pick the funds you invest in.

Usually there are passively managed funds in a 401k. Typically there’s a least an S&P 500 fund, a bond index fund, and often an international index fund. That’s all you need, and nobody is going to sell shares in those funds without your say-so. My 401k allows me to select a target ratio between each fund, so I can have whatever split I want, and I can choose to have it auto-rebalance (I think it costs something) or just contribute new money according to that ratio (free, that’s what I do).

Every 401k is a little different, but 401k custodians have certain fiduciary responsibilities, so they have to provide a reasonable selection of funds. Even actively managed funds can be fairly passive, so read up on the prospectus and find a lowish cost fund that targets an index, even if it’s actively managed.

Corgana , to Star Trek in Is there a Lower Decks community?
@Corgana@startrek.website avatar

Post your thread here. Seems counterproductive to create increasingly specific communities when the ones we have are still far from oversaturated.

LillyPip OP ,
@LillyPip@lemmy.ca avatar

Is a community for each series excessively specific, though?

Some of them have very different fan bases (thinking TOS vs Voyager, or anything vs the obviously superior Enterprise.)

abbadon420 ,
Piecemakers3Dprints ,
@Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world avatar

Cheeky.

Stamets ,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

I mean… They’re really not that different. They’re till Trek fans who prefer a different flavor of Trek. Star Trek is pretty consistent in the image that it puts forward and that doesn’t change very much per series. Plus, one of the worst things about reddit is the ability to have hyper specific subreddits for anything. They all end up causing an echo chamber and end up being not that encouraging to new members. I really don’t wanna see that happen to the Trek communities here on lemmy, personally.

SARGEx117 ,

I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said, EXCEPT that they’re not that different. I think most of the shows have a very unique tone, especially when you go from TNG to DS9, but unless I’m mistaken DS9 was intended to be “different”.

Maybe a few of the new ones are pretty similar, that’s for sure. But the older ones? Nah.

But I’m not looking for an echo of what I just said, so by all means if anyone wants to disagree with me, by all means! I don’t get a chance to talk about trek outside of the internet and I’d love to hear other takes on them.

Edit: and only after posting did I realize you meant the FANS aren’t that different, but you do go on to say the shows are pretty consistent so I’ll leave this here.

Stamets ,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Yeah, your edit is right there. The fans are essentially all the same but with different preferences. The shows all have their own vibe and tone that are pretty different. Well I’d argue that TNG and VOY are very close in tone but that’s about it.

SARGEx117 ,

100% agree with Voyager. I think Picard would handle things with more restraint, and probably would have taken an additional few years to get home, but really it’s “exploration… with a twist

I don’t know if we would have gotten protosalamander babies in tng, but then again we got sub rosa so…

Stamets ,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Pretty much. People give Janeway a lot of shit but I honestly think she takes her job as a Captain about as seriously as Picard. As well as their duty/oath to Starfleet. Doesn’t mean their perfect by a longshot but she deserves more credit than she gets. Took an insane amount of guts to (on multiple occasions) put the needs of the many against the needs of the few. Especially when those few were herself and the crew. Even more amazing when you see the times that the crew are given a chance to leave and no one does. Except Seska but we don’t talk about that Cardassian bitch.

Infynis ,
@Infynis@midwest.social avatar

Lower Decks addresses it very well in Twovix. The situation is different when you have the whole Federation there to help you out. Voyager was no Equinox.

Stamets ,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

I think that was probably my favorite part of Twovix. Everyone was horrified someone had to die but everyone kinda understood too. There was no answer to it and it was fucked up but honestly it’d be fucked up to keep Tuvix as well. No one judged her for making that call with no external Federation support.

Was nice to see that instead of strictly “JANEWAY MURDERER” after she constantly puts herself and the crew in harms way to help civilians.

SARGEx117 ,

She was absolutely between a rock and a hard place. You have a responsibility to get everyone home, but you can’t just dive straight in and strong arm your way to get there as fast as possible, both because that’s a shitty thing to do and because you’ll likely face consequences at the very least by starfleet when you get home, maybe by delta species who don’t like what you’re doing.

Honestly I don’t know a single person who has a negative thing to say about Janeway, except maybe she was too restrained sometimes.

How many of the crew, especially the Maquis, had nothing to return to and could have settled on one of the worlds they encountered? That said it’s a completely foreign society whose complications and nuances you couldn’t possibly be able to comprehend in the few weeks Voyager is within range.

Seska? I’m not aware of a crew member with that name. There was a Cardassian spy on board one of the ships, but… She’s no longer a concern.

SARGEx117 ,

For now, given the size of the user base? Yes.

Will it be forever?

I pray to the Black Mountain Koala, NO.

With a fairly small amount of people, splitting up the fanbase seems counterproductive.

Besides, us lower-decker gotta stick together, unless it’s delta shift (who really think Enterprise was the peak)

LillyPip OP ,
@LillyPip@lemmy.ca avatar

Excellent points.

andthenthreemore ,
@andthenthreemore@startrek.website avatar

With the size of the community here? Yes very much.

It might be worth it if here gets as big as Reddit.

StillPaisleyCat ,
@StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website avatar

This instance and community it doing well, but is far from the half million base on the old place.

The mods have been really positive towards establishing new communities as volumes pick up. Many of us would like to see the one for Treklit (books and comics) split of, but we just don’t have the numbers to make those kinds of communities viable yet.

Also, there’s really benefits to a crosscutting discussion. Things are civil enough here that it’s working.

We see a lot of people here finally becoming persuaded to give shows they’d passed on a try, including Lower Decks.

RxBrad , to homelab in You Don't Need to Keep Every Electronic Box!
@RxBrad@lemmings.world avatar

You’re not my real dad. You can’t tell me what to do.

https://lemmings.world/pictrs/image/6fec80ed-5ef8-47e2-b5dd-d980a3623eb1.jpeg

Blaze ,
@Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Impressive bunch of boxes

slippery_salmons OP ,

What a familiar sight!

d_ohlin ,

Lmao this is impressive even puts my pile to shame 😂

kratoz29 ,

This is amazing, wait, that wasn’t the point of this post.

RxBrad ,
@RxBrad@lemmings.world avatar

There’s some real history in there if you look close enough! My VHS Player, the old WRT-54G router, a George Foreman Grill…

I don’t have a problem, you do!

7Sea_Sailor ,

I feel personally attacked by this comment

im-in-this-photo-and-i-dont-like-it-1024x579

Erasmus , to Work Reform in Almost all remote-work news is negative now but was positive in the beginning of the pandemic. Have you noticed this or am I going crazy?
@Erasmus@lemmy.world avatar

Yes and here is some irony I found.

My company requires us to take various learning course throughout the year. Some assigned - some pick your own. A lot of it is the usual B.S. that everyone has to do.

I was browsing thru the managerial list and picked one of the ones that sounded interesting the other day about ‘How to be a better Manager’ and smack in the middle of the first chapter was this big video with this woman giving this speech about being accepting of people who wanted/needed to work from home or telecommute.

My ears instantly perked up.

The video went on to throw up all this data showing how more and more people were doing this and it had this graph from 2012 on and how this was the natural progression in the workplace and how we as managers needed to be accepting of peoples position and feelings toward this and learn to be accommodating as we would see more of it.

I was like WTF??!

When the course ended I scrolled through it looking for a date and I believe it was 2017.

Amazing how the tune has changed but the data hasn’t.

Kalkaline , to Ask Science in This is probably a dumb question, but if we eliminate the hydrophobia caused by rabies, would it increase the survival rate of active rabies?
@Kalkaline@leminal.space avatar

The “cure” for rabies is to treat it with a vaccine prior to symptoms appearing. The rabbies vaccine is 100% effective and you will not become symptomatic if you treat soon after the bite. The Milwaukee protocol has been tried and it’s a last ditch effort for people who didn’t get the vaccine shortly after the bite and are now showing symptoms. They don’t even know if the Milwaukee Protocol is what prevented death or if the people it worked on were somehow resistant to rabies.

Anticorp ,

Why can’t we just get a rabies vaccine when we’re kids, or every few years, like most other vaccines? Why does it have to be after the bite event?

Kalkaline ,
@Kalkaline@leminal.space avatar

Because unless you’re living and working in a high risk environment, there’s no need for a human to go get a rabies vaccine because they can just avoid mammals that are acting strangely. It’s not like it’s airborne, you have to get a penetrating bite from a symptomatic animal to get it, so when that happens you just go to the doctor. You’d still likely get the vaccine even after a bite even if you had been previously vaccinated.

Anticorp ,

What if you’re backpacking or something when you get bit? How long of a safety window do you have between getting bit and getting the vaccine?

Kalkaline ,
@Kalkaline@leminal.space avatar

Incubation period is as little as a week, but as great as a year. You would want to be vaccinated ASAP because otherwise it’s a death sentence.

Anticorp ,

Thanks!

howrar , (edited )

Considering that it has to go through the belly button, I’d rather not, thanks.

This is apparently not the case anymore since the 1980s.

emergencyfood ,

Modern rabies vaccines are injected into the upper arm.

howrar ,

Oh, that’s good to know. Thanks.

emergencyfood ,

Vets and people who work in animal shelters often get the rabies vaccines beforehand. But even if you have been vaccinated previously, you still have to get it again if you are bitten.

Anticorp ,

Then what’s the point of getting it beforehand?

Senshi ,

The efficacy of vaccines usually declines over time after administration. The immune system starts to “forget” how to fight a pathogen it doesn’t encounter. It doesn’t completely forget, but it puts the treatment data way back in the archives. So when it encounters the real deal, it can take quite a while to boot up production of antibodies. It also varies by the type of disease.

This is fine for some slow diseases ( which is why sometimes a single vaccination can suffice ), but can be risky if the disease progresses faster than the immune system can ramp up the defenses.

Administering the vaccine as soon as possible after suspected exposure to deadly or highly contagious diseases simply helps the immune system to get the necessary blueprints to get in the fight quicker.

Administering the vaccine before any exposure at regular, long intervals is done to decrease the baseline risk. Sometimes you don’t know you have been infected. Many diseases are not only transmitted by dramatic, obvious vectors. In those cases, it’s definitely better to have some old defense than none at all.

Anticorp ,

Thank you for the in-depth explanation! I appreciate it.

emergencyfood ,

In addition to what Senshi said, if you have recieved the full course of vaccines (4-5 doses spread over a month), any future bites need only 1-3 doses. Also the time within which you have to take the first dose increases from 24 hours to 2-3 days, which can be quite useful to vets in remote places.

BaalInvoker , to Ask Science in Is there any scientific study about where should the bed be facing?

This kind of thinking is just superstition. The earth magnetic field does NOT influence in any way your sleep.

This is just magical thinking distortion.

The bed must be only in a cozy and dark environment, not too warm nor too cold. Also, your bed room must be used only to sleep or sex. Don’t do any exciting or stressful activity on your bedroom.

dustyData ,

only to sleep or sex

Don’t do anything exciting

Do you mean to say that sex isn’t exciting. Or are we only supposed to have boring sex in our bedrooms. Or are you implying that the only exciting sex happens outside the bedroom?

BaalInvoker ,

Oh, man… Don’t be like that…

You got what I said.

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

I use my bed for pooping.

moody ,

Sex is for procreation only. No fun or excitement allowed. It must be silent, and exclusively in the missionary position. Deviation from these rules is unacceptable.

lemming ,

That’s a strong claim you’ve got there. It seems humans do possess some amount of magnetoreception, there’s even a suggested mechanism. It might be jammed by certain radiofrequencies, although I don’t know if they are still in use. Some other mammals have been shown to sense magnetism too. Personally, when I’m in a bed, especially a new one, I feel my rotation relative to my normal bed. It isn’t very precise and it’s difficult to test, so I can’t be entirely sure, but that’s how it feels. I don’t know about any studies relating magnetism and sleep. I know there historically were people who claimed it matters to them, but I think that unless you already know that it matter to you, it probably doesn’t. I’d say that much more important is darkness. Also, I heard people feel better with feet towards the door, but I don’t know if it’s proven in any way.

lemming ,

I wonder why I’m being downvoted. I very much welcome discussion. If you want to tell me why I’m wrong, like that cryptochromes cannot be used in sensing magnetic field upon closer look etc., I’d be excited. Disagreement without pointing out any mistakes I did brings me nothing.

If it’s just disbelief, I would’ve preferred being asked for sources. Even wikipedia mentions some of what I wrote (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetoreception) and while I admit my source isn’t primary literature, it is a monography about senses and I would’ve made an effort to track down at least some of the original papers.

khaosworks , (edited ) to Star Trek in Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x04 "Something Borrowed, Something Green"
@khaosworks@startrek.website avatar

T’Lyn was such a wild woman this week. Admiring Nya’al’s appearance, telling Tendi that what matters is being a loyal friend, saying she was alarmed by D’Erika’s combat abilities and then tossing that report out of the ship with a flimsy justification. Even Mariner said so. OUT OF CONTROL I TELL YOU!

jaelisp ,
@jaelisp@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

She has lost ALL control eyebrow

Discoslugs , to Work Reform in Got laid off today.
@Discoslugs@lemmy.world avatar

Staying away from austin is the right choice. Its all hype. That city was dope 10 years ago and has gotten shittier every day.

Dkarma ,

This is the second time I’ve heard this in the past few weeks.

thal3s ,
@thal3s@sh.itjust.works avatar

“Keep Austin weird” died decades ago.

renownedballoonthief ,

It only ever was weird in the most middle class, white, liberal definition of the word.

thesmokingman ,

Having come out of the music scene in that part of the US, I vehemently disagree. There used to be some really cool weird shit. That’s been displaced now and the slogan has been co-opted, sure, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t rad as fuck a couple of decades ago.

Souyo ,

I’m trying to get up out of this bitch.

wesker , to LinkedinLunatics in Belching
@wesker@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

The pallette for the syntax highlighter is horrid. Hardly readable.

Deceptichum ,
@Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works avatar

But it is highlighter colour!

AdamEatsAss , to Work Reform in Almost all remote-work news is negative now but was positive in the beginning of the pandemic. Have you noticed this or am I going crazy?

I think it’s partially rage bait at this point. At the start of the pandemic remote work was a new idea and it was easy to get views on an article about it. Now you need a shocking title that’ll enrage people to get engagement on the topic.

TurdFerguson ,

New idea? I remember it being a new idea in the early 2000s

AdamEatsAss ,

Since companies adopted computers and the Internet it’s been possible. I remember my dad working from home every now and then. But the idea that almost any desk job could be done remotely full time is new.

TurdFerguson ,

The pandemic definitely pushed companies into finally adopting it, but believe me, it was not a new concept. I remember reading an article 20 yrs ago about Best Buy adopting it, for example, and how it increased productivity and morale, etc. Since then, it’s been catching on, I’ve had plenty of friends that have worked from home since long before the pandemic, it’s just that a lot of companies were still afraid of giving their employees that much autonomy.

gmtom ,
@gmtom@lemmy.world avatar

If you could look into the investment portfolios of big companies and the rich people that run them you would see that the biggest sector is commercial real estate. In the UK pre pandemic, 40% of investments went into commercial real estate. So thats the main reason they are pushing it.

rambaroo ,

It wasn’t a new idea and it wasn’t rage bait. My company internally praised us for increased productivity during the pandemic, and now they’re trying to gaslight us into RTO.

This isn’t about productivity. These companies are lying. This is 100% about real estate investments, tax breaks, and flexing power over their employees’ lives.

Acid , to Star Trek in Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Strange New Worlds | 2x07 "Those Old Scientists"
@Acid@startrek.website avatar

This episode is one of the best episodes in the modern era of Trek, it’s lighthearted it’s funny it celebrates Trek and it’s done so tastefully that I genuinely have nothing bad to say about it. It reminds me of Trials and Tribble-ations.

Plus that line at the end where they tell Una ad astra per aspera and that’s why boimler joined Starfleet is just the right kind of emotions.

Honestly, they smashed it in this episode and ofc the 2d animated intro was chefs kiss.

YoBuckStopsHere ,
@YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world avatar

This episode is one of the best episodes in the modern era of Trek, it’s lighthearted it’s funny it celebrates Trek and it’s done so tastefully that I genuinely have nothing bad to say about it. It reminds me of Trials and Tribble-ations.

Alex Kurtzman must have hated this episode, it is the exact opposite of what he wanted to do with Trek. Also why fans love it, because Alex was always wrong about what Trek is about and why it matters to the fans.

concrete_baby ,

Why is it the exact opposite of what Alex Kurtzman wants to do?

YoBuckStopsHere ,
@YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world avatar

Kurtzman wanted a serious dark tone that excluded humor, excluded science, and promoted how progressive the future would be. He selected a largely female-diverse cast and wrote that all white males would be stupid or evil in the script. Then he proceeded to change the look and style of Trek away from the established canon to whatever garbage he came up with. Maybe if the writing was better it could have worked but that writing was bad, very very bad. This was the age of discovery in Trek where Star Fleet was full of brave heroes. He wrote his characters to be weak, angry, or overly emotional. The cast of Strange New Worlds feels like Star Fleet, they can have emotions but they are written to understand the dangers they are in are part of why they are doing what they do. Exploration is dangerous, you need to have a backbone to survive it.

concrete_baby ,

I disagree. Trek has always been progressive, and that’s what the whole series is about: infinite diversity in infinite combinations. TOS had Chekov, a Russian on the bridge in an American show during the Cold War era. It had Uhura, a Black woman on the bridge at the age of segregation and institutional racism. It had Sulu, a Japanese man when Japanese American families were wrongly incarcerated only years ago in WWII. The founders of the Federation were from four different species and set aside differences to build a better union. It’s the bastion of progressivism, and a rebuke to conservatism and isolationism.

Let’s move on to the Berman era. The Federation is now what people like Tasha Yar look up to, after spending her childhood escaping rape gangs. What does the Federation stand for? Equality. We have Doctor and Data trying to be recognized as equals to sentient beings. We have Tasha Yar, a woman engineer, Kathryn Janeway, a woman captain, Kira Nerys, a woman Bajoran leader on DS9. Berman and his colleagues never seriously considered a man playing the captain of the Voyager. They also made women characters complex and gave us Seven of Nine and Kai Winn, who both have their own motivations and personal history that shape their characters. And who can forget the Sisko as the first Black captain leading a series and his realistic relationship with Jake?

Kurtzman is also the executive producer on SNW, so I’m not sure what you’re on about. Kurtzman carried on the Roddenberry vision of filling leading Trek roles with a diverse cast, SNW, LOW, PRO, and DIS included.

all white males would be stupid or evil in the script

I have no idea where you got that from. Is Stamets evil? Is Sarek evil? Is SNW Pike evil? Is Chief Kyle evil? Well, yes, very evil. The only evil white male character I can think of is mirror Lorca.

This was the age of discovery in Trek where Star Fleet was full of brave heroes. He wrote his characters to be weak, angry, or overly emotional.

I feel like you’re idolizing “heroes” as demigods in real life, much like how Christopher Columbus was celebrated, when in reality he committed genocide and enslaved generations of Native Americans. Heroes in Earth’s age of discovery were also humans. They had emotions, they had feelings, they cried, they had PTSD, they were angry, and some of them were weak. Some of them had egos that cost their lives (see Robert Scott’s expedition to the South Pole.)

Zpiritual ,

I feel like the cast isn’t the issue and that it’s more about what you do with the cast that’s been a bit underwhelming at times. And he’s right about the lack of goofyness in modern trek and I’m glad it’s back in force with this season!

mplewis ,
@mplewis@lemmy.globe.pub avatar

Exploration is dangerous. That’s why you need a team you trust to give you the diverse perspective you need to survive it.

Acid ,
@Acid@startrek.website avatar

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the moderator]

  • Loading...
  • YoBuckStopsHere ,
    @YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world avatar

    Yes, and look at those characters. Unless the character is gay, they are written to be negative or evil.

    Acid ,
    @Acid@startrek.website avatar

    [Thread, post or comment was deleted by the moderator]

  • Loading...
  • YoBuckStopsHere ,
    @YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world avatar

    He is gay which separates him.

    ScrivenerX ,

    excluded humor, excluded science,

    I seem to remember the first instance of “fuck” in star trek being a humorous scene about science.

    promoted how progressive the future would be.

    Like every other star trek?

    I’m not a huge Disco fan. I think it doesn’t stand up and is way too focused on how everyone feels, but complaining about “oh no! SJWs!” Is just a roundabout way of saying you are racist/sexist. I think there are some good ideas in Disco but moving away from the episodic formula hurt the show. SNW does much of the same stuff as Disco, but is plot driven not character driven, which is fundamental difference between Disco and other Trek. Picard went the same way as Disco and suffered for it.

    I hope that the success of SNW and LD help them realize what parts of the formula work and what doesn’t.

    Taleya ,

    Oh hon, your entire arse is showing

    ValueSubtracted OP Mod ,
    @ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

    This is a good time to remind the group that we have zero tolerance for bigotry.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines